Evaluacija 3D modela osteosarkoma: eksperimentalna studija i matematičko modelovanje odgovora na lek Naučni rad

Glavni sadržaj članka

Marija Pavlović
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3055-7413
Ivana Banićević
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1494-3264
Radmila Janković
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5733-9505
Jasmina Stojkovska
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6732-3037
Bojana Obradović
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7276-0442

Apstrakt

Osteosarkom i dalje predstavlja značajan klinički izazov, sa lošim ishodima u slučaju metastaza i sporim napretkom u razvoju novih terapija. U ovom radu je prethodno razvijen 3D model osteosarkoma, koji se sastoji od makroporoznih alginatnih nosača sa česticama hidroksiapatita, koji oponašaju koštano tkivo, i protočnog bioreaktora, procenjen kao alat za ispitivanje antitumorskih lekova. Ćelija mišjeg osteosarkoma (K7M2-wt) zasejane su na nosače (15×10⁶ ćelija po cm³) i gajene jedan dan u statičnim uslovima. U dve eksperi­mentalne serije nosači su potom izloženi doksorubicinu (1 µg cm⁻³) u protočnim uslovima tokom 1 ili 3 dana (površinska brzina 40 µm s⁻¹), čime su simulirani uslovi nakon resekcije tumora, sa pretežno pojedinačnim ili slabo agregiranim ćelijama. U dve dodatne serije isti tretmani primenjeni su nakon 7 dana protočne kulture, kada su se formirali kompaktni sferoidi, čime je simuliran razvijen tumor. Histološka analiza i MTT test korišćeni su za procenu morfologije ćelija i njihove metaboličke aktivnosti. Kratkotrajni tretman imao je zanemarljiv efekat, dok je produžena izloženost značajno smanjila metaboličku aktivnost pojedinačnih ćelija, dok su sferoidne strukture pokazale povećanu otpornost na doksorubicin. Radi objašnjenja rezultata dobijenih u prve dve eksperimentalne serije, razvijen je matematički model koji opisuje transport leka, intracelularnu akumulaciju, proliferaciju ćelija i njihovo odumiranje. Model je uspešno opisao početnu fazu tretmana, ali je precenio efekat produžene izloženosti, ukazujući na mogućnost postojanja dodatnih mehanizama rezistencije. Sveukupno, rezultati potvrđuju potencijal ovog 3D modela za ispitivanje antitumorskih lekova.

Detalji članka

Broj časopisa

Rubrika

Biohemijsko inženjerstvo - Bioreaktori

Kako citirati

[1]
M. Pavlović, I. Banićević, R. Janković, J. Stojkovska, and B. Obradović, “Evaluacija 3D modela osteosarkoma: eksperimentalna studija i matematičko modelovanje odgovora na lek: Naučni rad”, Hem Ind, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 71–86, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.2298/HEMIND260706008P.

Funding data

Reference

[1] Hosseini H, Heydari S, Hushmandi K, Daneshi S, Raesi R. Bone tumors: a systematic review of prevalence, risk determinants, and survival patterns. BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1): 321. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13720-0

[2] Cole S, Gianferante DM, Zhu B, Mirabello L. Osteosarcoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program‐based analysis from 1975 to 2017. Cancer. 2022; 128(11): 2107–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34163

[3] Misaghi A, Goldin A, Awad M, Kulidjian AA. Osteosarcoma: a comprehensive review. SICOT J. 2018; 4: 12. https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017028

[4] Zhang Y, Yang J, Zhao N, Wang C, Kamar S, Zhou Y, He Z, Yang J, Sun B, Shi X, Han L, Yang Z. Progress in the chemotherapeutic treatment of osteosarcoma (Review). Oncol Lett. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9434

[5] Lieu CH, Tan A-C, Leong S, Diamond JR, Eckhardt SG. From bench to bedside: lessons learned in translating preclinical studies in cancer drug development. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013; 105(19): 1441–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt209

[6] Pu F, Guo H, Shi D, Chen F, Peng Y, Huang X, Liu J, Zhang Z, Shao Z. The generation and use of animal models of osteosarcoma in cancer research. Genes Dis. 2024; 11(2): 664–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2022.12.021

[7] Esposito A, Ferraresi A, Vallino L, Garavaglia B, Dhanasekaran DN, Isidoro C. Three-Dimensional In Vitro Cell Cultures as a Feasible and Promising Alternative to Two-Dimensional and Animal Models in Cancer Research. Int J Biol Sci. 2024; 20(13): 5293–311. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.96469

[8] Baek N, Seo OW, Kim M, Hulme J, An SSA. Monitoring the effects of doxorubicin on 3D-spheroid tumor cells in real-time. Onco Targets Ther. 2016; 9: 7207–18. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S112566

[9] Wan X, Li Z, Ye H, Cui Z. Three-dimensional perfused tumour spheroid model for anti-cancer drug screening. Biotechnol Lett. 2016; 38(8): 1389–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-016-2035-1

[10] Banicevic I, Milosevic M, Petrovic J, Milivojevic M, Gasik M, Stojkovska J, Obradovic B. Macroporous alginate scaffolds with calcium phosphate filler as a 3D in vitro microenvironment supporting bone cancer cells. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials. 2026; 75(7): 820–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2025.2608101

[11] Lin H, Yeh Y. Porous alginate/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Preparation, characterization, and in vitro studies. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004; 71B(1): 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30065

[12] Iglesias-Mejuto A, García-González CA. 3D-printed alginate-hydroxyapatite aerogel scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2021; 131: 112525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112525

[13] Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol. 2012; 30(10): 546–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005

[14] Lee SS, Du X, Kim I, Ferguson SJ. Scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering. Matter. 2022; 5(9): 2722–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2022.06.003

[15] Martin I, Wendt D, Heberer M. The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2004; 22(2): 80–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.12.001

[16] Hirt C, Papadimitropoulos A, Muraro MG, Mele V, Panopoulos E, Cremonesi E, Ivanek R, Schultz-Thater E, Droeser RA, Mengus C, Heberer M, Oertli D, Iezzi G, Zajac P, Eppenberger-Castori S, Tornillo L, Terracciano L, Martin I, Spagnoli GC. Bioreactor-engineered cancer tissue-like structures mimic phenotypes, gene expression profiles and drug resistance patterns observed “in vivo”. Biomaterials. 2015; 62: 138–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.037

[17] Friedrich J, Seidel C, Ebner R, Kunz-Schughart LA. Spheroid-based drug screen: considerations and practical approach. Nat Protoc. 2009; 4(3): 309–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.226

[18] Kim M, Gillies RJ, Rejniak KA. Current Advances in Mathematical Modeling of Anti-Cancer Drug Penetration into Tumor Tissues. Front Oncol. 2013; 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2013.00278

[19] El-Kareh AW, Secomb TW. Two-mechanism peak concentration model for cellular pharmacodynamics of Doxorubicin. Neoplasia. 2005; 7(7): 705–13. https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.05118

[20] Januškevičienė I, Petrikaitė V. Exploring doxorubicin transport in 2D and 3D models of MDA-MB-231 sublines: impact of hypoxia and cellular heterogeneity on doxorubicin accumulation in cells. Am J Cancer Res. 2024; 14(7): 3584–99. https://doi.org/10.62347/VNWH9165

[21] Szakács G, Paterson JK, Ludwig JA, Booth-Genthe C, Gottesman MM. Targeting multidrug resistance in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006; 5(3): 219–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1984

[22] Eliaz RE, Nir S, Marty C, Szoka FC. Determination and modeling of kinetics of cancer cell killing by doxorubicin and doxorubicin encapsulated in targeted liposomes. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(2): 711–8. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-0654

[23] Stojkovska J, Zvicer J, Andrejevic M, Janackovic D, Obradovic B, Veljovic DN. Novel composite scaffolds based on alginate and Mg-doped calcium phosphate fillers: Enhanced hydroxyapatite formation under biomimetic conditions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2021; 109(12): 2079–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34856

[24] Stojkovska J, Zvicer J, Milivojevic M, Petrovic I, Stevanovic M, Obradovic B. Validation of a novel perfusion bioreactor system in cancer research. Hem Ind. 2020; 74(3): 187–96. https://doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND200329015S

[25] Gamble M. The Hematoxylins and Eosin. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. Elsevier; 2008;121–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-10279-0.50016-6

[26] Bayen AM., Kong Qingkai, Siauw Timmy. Python programming and numerical methods : a guide for engineers and scientists. Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier; 2021

[27] Tu B, Zhu J, Liu S, Wang L, Fan Q, Hao Y, Fan C, Tang T-T. Mesenchymal stem cells promote osteosarcoma cell survival and drug resistance through activation of STAT3. Oncotarget. 2016; 7(30): 48296–308. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10219

[28] Yang J, Ma Z, Wang Y, Wang Z, Tian Y, Du Y, Bian W, Duan Y, Liu J. Necrosis of osteosarcoma cells induces the production and release of high mobility group box 1 protein. Exp Ther Med. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.5415

[29] Abdollahzadeh H, Amoabediny G, Haghiralsadat F, Rahimi F, Adibfar A. Liposomal Doxorubicin Kinetic Study in an In vitro 2D and 3D Tumor Model for Osteosarcoma in a Perfusion Bioreactor. Pharm Nanotechnol. 2023; 11(5): 447–59. https://doi.org/10.2174/2211738511666230501202946

[30] Minchinton AI, Tannock IF. Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006; 6(8): 583–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1893

[31] Lobo ED, Balthasar JP. Pharmacodynamic modeling of chemotherapeutic effects: Application of a transit compartment model to characterize methotrexate effects in vitro. AAPS PharmSci. 2002; 4(4): 212–22. https://doi.org/10.1208/ps040442

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Najčitanije od istog autora

1 2 3 > >>