DESIGN OF INDUSTRY-CENTRIC CONTROLLER FOR MIMO CSTH PROCESS WITH ENHANCED DISTURBANCE REJECTION

Original scientific paper

Authors

  • Pream Anand Siva Shankaran Department of Instrumentation Engineering, Anna University MIT Campus, Chennai, India
  • Manamalli Deivasikamani Department of Instrumentation Engineering, Anna University MIT Campus, Chennai, India
  • Vasanthi Damodaran Department of Instrumentation Engineering, Anna University MIT Campus, Chennai, India
  • Mythily Mani Department of Instrumentation Engineering, Anna University MIT Campus, Chennai, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ250306022S

Keywords:

CSTH, MIMO, PID, MPC, RTD-A, Disturbance Rejection.

Abstract

This paper focuses on designing an advanced control scheme tailored for large-scale industrial processes, where controllers must maintain effective performance despite significant disturbances and setpoint changes. The primary focus of the proposed RTD-A controller is on robust disturbance rejection. RTD-A possesses the benefits of both conventional PID and MPC control schemes. As model-based methods face challenges in addressing increasingly complex processes, data-driven techniques have gained popularity in industrial system monitoring due to their ability to handle unknown physical models. In this work, both the first-principle and transfer function models of the CSTH system are developed using real-time data and represented as a multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) system. PID, MPC, and RTD-A controllers are then applied to regulate the temperatures of the two tanks. The performance of these controllers is carefully examined using integral performance criteria and the time domain analysis to accurately assess their dynamic behavior and control precision. The results demonstrate that the RTD-A controller exhibits superior performance in mitigating disturbances. The RTD-A control strategy exhibits outstanding performance with near-zero overshoot (0% in servo and about 0.05% in regulatory responses) and stable settling times close to 430 - 440 seconds in both tanks. Although MPC and PID controllers offer quicker responses, their greater overshoot and longer settling times establish RTD-A as the preferred method for achieving reliable, precise, and safe control in industrial processes.

References

[1] N.F. Thornhill, S.C. Patwardhan, S.L. Shah, J. Process Control 18 (2008) 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2007.07.006.

[2] J. Zheng, H. Wang, H. Zhou, T. Gao, IEEE Seventh Int. Conf. Intell. Control Inf. Process Siem Reap, Cambodia (2016) p. 98–104. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7885883.

[3] A. Albagul, M. Saad, Y. Abujeela, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Electron. Eng. 2 (2014) 130–134. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324165363.

[4] A. Simorgh, A. Razminia, V. Shiryaev, Math. Comput. Simul. 173 (2020) 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2020.01.010.

[5] V. Kabila, G. Devadhas, Indian J. Sci. Technol. 8 (2015) 1–7. https://indjst.org/articles/comparative-analysis-of-pid-and-fuzzy-pid-controller-performance-for-continuous-stirred-tank-heater https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i23/85351.

[6] A.D. Priya, G. Tamilselvan, T. Rajesh, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Res. 10 (2018) 78–81. https://www.ciitresearch.org/dl/index.php/fs/article/view/FS032018006.

[7] Q.A. Mahmood, A.T. Nawaf, Mater. Today: Proc. 42 (2022) 2545–2552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.577.

[8] Y. Zhang, Y. Yang, S.X. Ding, L. Li, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. Control Instrum. 61–11 (2014) 6409–6417. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6718131.

[9] K. Kumar, T.A.N. Heirung, S.C. Patwardhan, B. Foss, IFAC-Papers Online 48 (2015) 545–550. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896315011052.

[10] X. Li, X. Jiang, Int. Conf. Adv. Control, Autom. Artif. Intell., Shenzhen, China (2018), p. 163–167. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedingsacaai-18/25892485.

[11] B.A. Ogunnaike, K. Mukati, J. Process Control 16 (2006) 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2005.08.001.

[12] K. Mukati, M. Rasch, B.A. Ogunnaike, J. Process Control 19 (2009) 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.03.004.

[13] C. Febina, V.D. Angeline, Int. Conf. Adv. Electr., Comput., Commun. Sustainable Technol. Bhilai, India (2021) p. 1–8. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9392600.

[14] K. Anbarasan, K. Srinivasan, ISA Trans. 57 (2015) 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2015.02.016.

[15] G. Stephanopoulos, Chemical Process Control, Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1984), p. 43. https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Chemical_Process_Control/rhUTrgEACAAJ?hl=en ISBN: 9788177584035

[16] V. Balakotaiah, D. Luss, Chem. Eng. Sci. 38 (1983) 1709–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(83)85028-3.

[17] B.W. Bequette, Process Control: Modeling, Design, and Simulation, Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2003), p. 196. https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Process_Control.html?id=PdjHYm5e9d4C ISBN: 0-13-206889-3

[18] A. O'Dwyer, in Handbook of PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules. Imperial College Press, London (2009), p. 350. https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Handbook_Of_Pi_And_Pid_Controller_Tuning/hF-7CgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=pid+controller+tuning&pg=PR7&printsec=frontcover

Published

— Updated on 14.08.2025

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

DESIGN OF INDUSTRY-CENTRIC CONTROLLER FOR MIMO CSTH PROCESS WITH ENHANCED DISTURBANCE REJECTION: Original scientific paper. (2025). Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ250306022S

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.