Main Article Content
Organic pollutants in sediments are a worldwide problem because sediments act as sinks for hydrophobic, toxic, persistent and bioaccumulative hazardous compoundssuch as pentachlorobenzene (PeCB). PeCB can be involved in adsorption, desorption and transformation processes and can be made available to benthic organisms through the sediment–water interface. In order to reduce the risk, this study investigates effects of the dose and contact time between sediment and carbon-rich amendments (activated carbon (AC), biochar (BC) and hummus (HC)) on the effectiveness of detoxification. Four doses of carbon-rich amendments (0.5-10 %) and four equilibrations contact times (14 - 180 days) were investigated. The present research highlights the need for further examination and process optimization of different carbon-rich materials used for contaminant removal. Results have shown that the smallest dose (0.5 %) of investigated sorbents was sufficient to reduce the bioavailable fraction of PeCB below 5 %, and the ageing process after 14 days for AC and 30 days for HM and BC negligibly influenced the bioavailable fraction.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors grant to the Publisher the following rights to the manuscript, including any supplemental material, and any parts, extracts or elements thereof:
- the right to reproduce and distribute the Manuscript in printed form, including print-on-demand;
- the right to produce prepublications, reprints, and special editions of the Manuscript;
- the right to translate the Manuscript into other languages;
- the right to reproduce the Manuscript using photomechanical or similar means including, but not limited to photocopy, and the right to distribute these reproductions;
- the right to reproduce and distribute the Manuscript electronically or optically on any and all data carriers or storage media – especially in machine readable/digitalized form on data carriers such as hard drive, CD-Rom, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), Mini-Disk, data tape – and the right to reproduce and distribute the Article via these data carriers;
- the right to store the Manuscript in databases, including online databases, and the right of transmission of the Manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
- the right to make the Manuscript available to the public or to closed user groups on individual demand, for use on monitors or other readers (including e-books), and in printable form for the user, either via the internet, other online services, or via internal or external networks.
Alexander M. Aging, bioavailability and overestimation of risk from environmental pollutants. Environ Sci Technol. 2000; 34(20): 4259–4265.
Bonten LTC, Grotenhuis TC, Rulkens WH. Enhancement of PAH biodegradation in soil by physicochemical pretreatment. Chemosphere. 1999; 38(15): 3627–3636.
Mueller JG, Cerniglia CE, Pritchard PH. Bioremediation of environmentscontaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In: Crawford RL, Crawford DL, ed., Bioremediation: Principles and Applications,BiotechnologyResearch Book 6, Cambridge University Press. 1996: 125–194.
Semple KT, Doick KJ, Wick LY, Harms H. Review microbial interactions withorganic contaminants in soil: definitions, processes and measurement. Environ Pollut. 2007; 150: 166–176.
Wu G, Kechavarzi C, Li X, Wu S, Pollard SJT, Sui H, Coulon F. Machine learning models for predicting PAHs bioavailability in compost amended soils. Chem Eng J. 2013; 223: 747–754.
Cachada A, Pereira R, Ferreira da Silva E, Duarte AC. The prediction of PAHs bioavailability in soils using chemical methods: state of the art and future challenges. Sci Total Environ.2014; 472: 463–480.
Wu G, Li X, Kechavarzi C, Sakrabani R, Sui H, Coulon F. Influence and interactions of multi-factors on the bioavailability of PAHs in compost amended contaminated soils. Chemosphere.2014; 107: 43–50.
Cho YM, Smithenry DW, Ghosh U, Kennedy AJ, Millward RN, Bridges TS, Luthy RG. Field methods for amending marine sediment with activated carbon and assessing treatment effectiveness. Mar Environ Res. 2007; 64: 541–555.
Chi J, Liu H. Effects of biochars derived from different pyrolysis temperatures on growth of Vallisneria spiralis and dissipation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments. Ecol Eng. 2016; 93: 199–206.
Rakowska MI, Kupryianchyk D, Harmsen J, Grotenhuis T, Koelmans AA. In situ remediation of contaminated sediments using carbonaceous materials. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2012; 31: 693–704.
Bailey RE, van Wijk D, Thomas PC. Review Sources and prevalence of pentachlorobenzene in the environment. Chemosphere. 2009, 75: 555–564.
Fang J, Zhan L, Ok YS, Gao B. Minireview of potential applications of hydrochar derived from hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. J Ind Eng Chem. 2018; 57: 15-21.
Kah M, Sigmund G, Xiao F, Hofmann T. Sorption of ionizable and ionic organic compounds to biochar, activated carbon and other carbonaceous materials. Water Res. 2017; 124: 673–692.
Tričković J, Ivančev-Tumbas I, Dalmacija B,Nikolić A, Trifunović S. Pentachlorobenzene sorption onto sediment organic matter. Org Geochem.2007;38: 1757–1769.
Vítková M, Dercová K. The application of humic acids as natural sorbents for bioremediation of soils contaminated with pentachlorophenol (PCP) https://is.stuba.sk/student/prilohy_zp.pl?download_priloha=20975;lang=sk;stu¬dium=64779;zp=22-388;verejny=1
ISO 11277:2009 - Soil quality - Determination of particle size distribution in mineral soil material - Method by sieving and sedimentation. 2009.
ISO 8245:1999 - Water quality — Guidelines for the determination of total organic carbon (TOC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). 1999.
USEPA, Method 3550B: Ultrasonic Extraction. 1995.
USEPA, Method 3660B: Sulfur Cleanup. 1996.
USEPA, Method 3620B: Florisil Cleanup. 1996.
USEPA, Method 8270C: SemivolatileOorganic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). 1996.
Spasojević JM, Maletić SP, Rončević SD, Radnović DV, Čučak DI, Tričković JS, Dalmacija BD. Using chemical desorption of PAHs from sediment to model biodegradation during bioavailability assessment. J Hazard Mater.2015; 283: 60–69.
Rončević S, Spasojević J, Maletić S, Jazić JM, Isakovski MK, Agbaba J, Grgić M, Dalmacija B, Assessment of the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of sediment spiked with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016; 23: 3239–3246.
Cornelissen G, Rigterink H, Ten Hulscher DEM, Vrind BA, Van Noort PCM. A simple Tenaxextraction method to determine the availability of sediment-sorbed organic compounds. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001; 20: 706–711.
Hua S, Gong JL, Zeng GM, Yao FB, Guo M, Ou XM. Remediation of organochlorine pesticides contaminated lake sediment using activated carbon and carbon nanotubes. Chemosphere. 2017; 177: 65-76.
Dubey RK, Tripathi V, Singh N, Abhilash PC. Phytoextraction and dissipation of lindane by Spinacia oleracea L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014; 109: 22–26.
Schrap SM, Sleijpen GLG, Seinen W, Opperhuizen A. Sorption Kinetics of Chlorinated Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals, Part II Desorption Experiments. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 1994; 1(2): 81- 92.
Cornelissen G, Van Noort PCM, Govers HAJ. Desorption kinetics of chlorobenzenes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and polychlorinated biphenyls: Sediment extraction with Tenax and effects of contact time and solute hydrophobicity. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1997; 16: 1351–1357.
Ghosh U, Luthy RG, Cornelissen G, Werner D, Menzie CA. In-situ sorbent amendments: A new direction in contaminated sediment management. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 45: 1163–1168.
Birdwell J, Cook RL, Thibodeaux LJ. Desorption kinetics of hydrophobic organic chemicals from sediment to water: A review of data and models. Environ Toxicol Chem.2007;26(3): 424–434.
Brennan A, Moreno Jiménez E, Alburquerque JA, Knapp CW, Switzer C. Effects of biochar and activated carbon amendment on maize growth and the uptake and measured availability ofpolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and potentially toxic elements (PTEs). Environ Pollut.2014; 193: 79–87.
Chai Y, Currie RJ, Davis JW, Wilken M, Martin GD, Fishman VN, Ghosh U. Effectiveness of Activated Carbon and Biochar in Reducing the Availability of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins/ dibenzofurans in Soils. Environ SciTechnol. 2012; 46: 1035–1043.
Josko I, Oleszczuk P, Pranagal J, Lehmann J, Xing B, Cornelissen G. Effect of biochars , activated carbon and multiwalled carbon nanotubes on phytotoxicity of sediment contaminated by inorganic and organic pollutants. Ecol Eng. 2013; 60: 50–59.
Oleszczuk P, Hale SE, Lehmann J, Cornelissen G. Activated carbon and biochar amendments decrease pore-water concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2012; 111: 84–91.
Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage D, Lee SS, Ok YS.Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review. Chemosphere. 2014; 99: 19–33.
Rajapaksha AU, Chen SS, Tsang DCW, Zhang M, Vithanage M, Mandal S, Gao B, Bolan NS, Ok YS. Review Engineered/designer biochar for contaminant removal/immobilization from soil and water: Potential and implication of biochar modification. Chemosphere. 2016; 148: 276-291.
Li H, Dong X, da Silva EB, de Oliveira LM, Chen Y, Ma LQ. Review Mechanisms of metal sorption by biochars: Biochar characteristics and modifications. Chemosphere. 2017; 178: 466-478.
Janssen EML, Oen AMP, Luoma SN, Luthy RG. Assessment of field-related influences on polychlorinated biphenyl exposures and sorbent amendment using polychaete bioassays and passive sampler measurements. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011; 30: 173–180.
Jonker MTO, Hoenderboom AM, Koelmans AA. Effects of sedimentary sootlike materials on bioaccumulation and sorption of polychlorinated biphenyls. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004; 23: 2563–2570.
Millward RN, Bridges TS, Ghosh U, Zimmerman JR, Luthy RG. Addition of activated carbon to sediments to reduce PCB bioaccumulation by a polychaete (Neanthesarenaceodentata) and an amphipod (Leptocheirusplumulosus). Environ Sci Technol. 2005; 39: 2880–2887.
McLeod PB, Luoma SN, Luthy RG. Biodynamic modeling of PCB uptake by Macomabalthica and Corbicula fluminea from sediment amended with activated carbon. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42: 484–490.
Sun XL, Ghosh U. PCB bioavailability control in Lumbriculus variegatus through different modes of activated carbon addition to sediments. Environ Sci Technol. 2007; 41: 4774–4780.
Cornelissen G, Gustafsson O, Bucheli TD, Jonker MTO, Koelmans AA, Van Noort PCM. Extensive Sorption of Organic Compounds to Black Carbon, Coal, and Kerogen in Sediments and Soils: Mechanisms and Consequences for Distribution, Bioaccumulation, and Biodegradation. Eviron Sci Technol. 2005; 39: 6881–6895.
Dongqiang Z, Pignatello J. Characterization of Aromatic Compound Sorptive Interactions with Black Carbon (Charcoal) Assisted by Graphite as a Model. Environ Sci Technol. 2005; 39: 2333–2041.
Vasilyeva GK, Strijakova ER, Nikolaeva SN, Lebedev AT, Shea PJ. Dynamics of PCB removal and detoxification in historically contaminated soils amended with activated carbon. Environ Pollut.2010;158: 770–777.
Bucheli TD, Gustafsson O. Soot sorption of non-ortho and ortho substituted PCB. Chemosphere. 2003; 53: 515–522.
Zhu D, Pignatello JJ. Characterization of aromatic compound sorptive interactions with black carbon (charcoal) assisted by graphite as a model. Environ Sci Technol. 2005; 39: 2033–2041.
Burgess RM, Ryba SA, Cantwell MG, Gundersen GL, Tyen R. Interaction of planar and nonplanar organic contaminants with coal fly ash: effects of polar and nonpolar solvent solutions. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006; 25: 2028–2037.