OPTIMIZATION OF LOW-COST COW DUNG BASED ACTIVATED CARBON FOR THE REMOVAL OF CARBOFURAN FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTION Original scientific paper

Article Sidebar

Vol 27 No 2
PDF (1.275 kB)
Published: Jul 14, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ200427033H
Keywords:
adsorbent, activated carbon, biowaste, cow dung, pesticides, wastewater treatment

Main Article Content

SHAMA MUSTAFA HAYDER
University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Punjab, Pakistan
SALMAN HUSSAIN
University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Punjab, Pakistan
WASIM AHMAD
University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Punjab, Pakistan
MIRZA JAHANZAIB
University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Punjab, Pakistan
ABAID ULLAH
University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Punjab, Pakistan

Abstract

Water pollution has become a serious issue of this century due to increased industrialization. Several methods have been adopted to tackle this issue, including adsorption by activated carbon (AC). Conventional sources of AC preparation are costly and non-renewable as well. Several fruit and agricultural wastes have characteristics to become sustainable feedstock for AC prepar­ation. This study aims to prepare cost effective AC from sustainable raw material, cow dung. The preparation has been analyzed and optimized by util­izing central composite design (CCD). The effect of activation temperature, time, and impregnation ratio (IR) on responses of percent yield (R1) and percent pesticide removal (R2) has been analyzed. Quadratic models have been suggested with R2, adjusted R2, and predicted R2 values of 0.98, 0.96, 0.89 for R1, and 0.97, 0.94, 0.87 for R2, respectively. Activation temperature and KOH/Feedstock ratio significantly influence the yield and pesticide removal. Optimized conditions of activation temperature, KOH/Feedstock ratio, and activation time are 708.07 °C, 1.22 and 0.66 h, respectively. These con­ditions produced 14.78% yield and 89.18% pesticide removal. SEM and BET analysis of optimized AC also confirmed porosity development and large surface area availability due to activation process. Findings of this study suggest that cow dung can be used to prepare low-cost AC for pesticide rem­oval from aqueous solution.

Article Details

How to Cite
HAYDER, S. M. ., HUSSAIN, S. ., AHMAD, W. ., JAHANZAIB, M. ., & ULLAH, A. . (2021). OPTIMIZATION OF LOW-COST COW DUNG BASED ACTIVATED CARBON FOR THE REMOVAL OF CARBOFURAN FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTION: Original scientific paper. Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 27(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ200427033H
Issue
Vol. 27 No. 2 (2021)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors grant to the Publisher the following rights to the manuscript, including any supplemental material, and any parts, extracts or elements thereof:

  • the right to reproduce and distribute the Manuscript in printed form, including print-on-demand;
  • the right to produce prepublications, reprints, and special editions of the Manuscript;
  • the right to translate the Manuscript into other languages;
  • the right to reproduce the Manuscript using photomechanical or similar means including, but not limited to photocopy, and the right to distribute these reproductions;
  • the right to reproduce and distribute the Manuscript electronically or optically on any and all data carriers or storage media – especially in machine readable/digitalized form on data carriers such as hard drive, CD-Rom, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), Mini-Disk, data tape – and the right to reproduce and distribute the Article via these data carriers; 
  • the right to store the Manuscript in databases, including online databases, and the right of transmission of the Manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
  • the right to make the Manuscript available to the public or to closed user groups on individual demand, for use on monitors or other readers (including e-books), and in printable form for the user, either via the internet, other online services, or via internal or external networks.

References

R. Kumar, S. Mukherji, Curr. Org. Chem. 22 (2018) 954-972

V.L. Zikankuba, G. Mwanyika, J. E. Ntwenya, A. James, Cogent Food Agric. 5 (2019) 1-15

W. Zhang, F. Jiang, J. Ou, Proc. Int. Acad. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 1 (2011) 125-144

A. Azizullah, M.N.K. Khattak, P. Richter, D.P. Häder, Environ. Int. 37 (2011) 479-497

K. Ahad, A. Mohammad, H. Khan, I.Ahmad, Y. Hayat, Environ. Monit. Assess. 166 (2010) 191-199

A. Ulhassan, A.B. Tabinda, M. Abbas, A.M. Khan, Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 51 (2014) 321-325

M.I. Tariq, S. Afzal, I. Hussain, Environ. Int. 30 (2004) 471-479

M.N. Qureshi, Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res., A 60 (2017) 101-105

G. Riaz, A.M. Tabinda, M. Kashif, A. Yasar, A. Mahmood, R. Rasheed, M.I. Khan, J. Iqbal, S. Siddique, Y. Mahfooz, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25 (2018) 22584-22597

S. Mahboob, F. Niazi, K. AlGhanim, S. Sultana, F. Al-Misned, Z. Ahmed, Environ. Monit. Assess. 187 (2015) 1-10

A.Jabbar, S.Z. Masud, Z. Parveen, M. Ali, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 51 (1993) 268-273

S. Salim, S. Satar, A. Sebe, H, Yesilagac, Mt. Sinai J. Med. 72 (2005) 389-392

S. Wong, N.A.N. Yac'cob, N. Ngadi, O. Hassan, I.M. Inuwa, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 26 (2018) 870-878

S.A. Maddodi, H.A. Alalwan, A.H. Alminshid, M.N. Abbas, S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 32 (2020) 5-12

N. Nourbakhsh, H.Z. Mousavi, E. Kolvari, A. Khaligh, Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 25 (2019) 107-117

S.S. Konstantinović, M.G. Kodrić, R. Ničić, D.M. Đorđević, Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 25 (2019) 11-19

D.D. Milenković, A.Lj. Bojić, V.B. Veljković, Ultrason. Sonochem. 20 (2013) 955-962

A.Pandiarajan, R. Kamaraj, S. Vasudevan, S. Vasudevan, Bioresour. Technol. 261 (2018) 329-341

G.D. Vyavahare, R.G. Gurav, P.P. Jadhav, R.R. Patil, C.B. Aware, J.P. Jadhav, Chemosphere 194 (2018) 306-315

H. Li, S. Yang, H. Sun, X. Liu, Bioresources 13 (2018) 3135-3143

D. Bhattacharjya, J.S. Yu, J. Power Sources 262 (2014) 224-231

H. Demiral, I. Demiral, Surf. Interface Anal. 40 (2008) 612-615

S.E. Elaigwu, L.A.Usman, G.V. Awolola, G.B. Adebayo, R.M.K. Ajayi, Adv. Nat. Appl. Sci. 3 (2009) 442-446

N.B. Azmi, M.J. Bashir, S. Sethupathi, N.C. Aun, G.C. Lam, Environ. Earth Sci. 75 (2016) 902

X. Chen, H. Zhang, Y. Guo, Y. Cao, F. Cheng, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 28 (2020) 299-306

I. Izhab, M. Asmadi, N.A.S. Amin, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46 (2020) 24754–24767

F. Ghorbani, S. Kamari, S. Zamani, S. Akbari, M. Salehi, Surf. Interfaces. 18 (2020) 100444

S. Kamari, F. Ghorban, A.M. Sanati, Sustainable Chem. Pharm. 13 (2019) 100153

A.Baçaoui, A.Yaacoubi, A.Dahbi, C.Bennouna, R.P.T. Luu, F.J. Maldonado-Hodar, J. Rivera-Utrilla, C. Moreno-Castilla, Carbon 39 (2001) 425-432

Z. Ilbay, A. Haşimoğlu, O.K. Ozdemir, F. Ateş, S. Şahin, J. Mol. Liq. 246 (2017) 208-214

J. Antony, Design of experiments for engineers and scientists, Butterworth-Heinemann, New York, 2003, p. 38

D. Adinata, W.M.A.W. Daud, M.K. Aroua, Bioresour. Technol. 98 (2007) 145-149

Y. Sudaryanto, S.B. Hartono, W. Irawaty, H. Hindarso, S. Ismadji, Bioresour. Technol. 97 (2006) 734-739

C.D. Şentorun-Shalaby, M.G. Uçak-Astarlıogˇlu, L. Artok, Levent, C. Sarıcı, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 88 (2006) 126-134

M. Shoaib, H.M. Al-Swaidan, Biomass Bioenergy 73 (2015) 124-134

Z. Ab. Ghani, M.S. Yusoff, N.Q. Zaman, M.F.M.A Zamri, J. Andas, Waste Manage. (Oxford, U. K.) 62 (2017) 177-187.